Hi gang,
With the new XJ about to finally become available, I suspect we'll see used X350s become even more affordable. That's got me to thinking whether I should go on the lookout for a 2005 or 2006 car (I don't like the 2007 "facelift" very much) to replace my 1995 X300 Daimler Six. Not that there's anything wrong with my old Daim but other than it being LWB, it's not overly practical in terms of interior passenger and storage space and I'm concerned that some parts can now only be had second-hand or are ridiculously expensive. Also, as a 1995 model, I'm constantly looking at its wheelarches and sills for signs of corrosion (I've aready replaced the nearside rear outer and inner wings).
... Then again does the X308 represent a good compromise between the X300 and X350?
So I'm trying to weigh up the pros and cons of al three models and this is what I've come up with so far...
X300
Pros:
Classic, nostalgic Jaguar look'n'feel.
Very reliable.
Maintenance largely easy for competent DIY'er.
Cons:
Wheelarch, sill and A-pillar corrosion problems on early models.
LWB version is the only realistic option for carrying rear passengers long distances.
Headroom limited for tall occupants.
Storage space (glovebox, etc) very limited.
Switchgear scattered about.
Some parts getting scarce and/or expensive.
Prone to underside scrapes on speed-bumps when carrying passengers, as is LWB version on steep ramps.
X308
Pros:
Great combination of classic interior with just the right amount of modernisation (IMHO).
Much less prone to corrosion than early X300s.
Improved ride quality over X300.
Parts availability and prices often better than that for X300 (for the time being, anyway).
Slightly higher off the ground in comparison to the X300, therefore better able to cope with modern roads.
Cons:
Cam chain tensioners on pre-August 2001 cars need (very expensive) replacement
Water pump prone to failure on pre-2001 cars
Throttle body suspect on pre-2001 cars?
If car has done over 100,000 miles without a change of ATF, assume gearbox will be on its way out.
Not a very "DIY-able" engine
More expensive to service than X300(?)
2001 Daimler variants scarce... 2002 models almost non-existent!
LWB only realistic option for carrying rear passengers long distances.
Headroom limited for tall occupants.
Storage space (glovebox, etc) very limited.
X350
Pros:
Wider choice of engines, including diesel
Better all-round occupant accommodation than X300 and X308 (LWB version no longer a necessity?)
More power than X300 and X308
More (genuinely useful) equipment
Improved boot space
Overall very reliable(?)
Cons:
CORROSION - and Jaguar's/Tata's refusal to acknowledge it
"Middle-age spread" bodyshape!
Rather "Ford-like" in some respects - no longer "feels" like a classic Jaguar(?)
CATS Suspension prone to (expensive) failure
Diesel Particulate Filter prone to failure.
Super V8 variants (not XJR) very scarce.
Daimler variants almost non-existent!
Overall the X300 is still a wonderful car but has practicality limitations. The X308 carries a risk of repair work that could easily outweight the value of the car itself. On paper the X350 is the outright winner but I have to say the corrosion problem - and, more particularly, Jaguar's disgraceful attitude towards it - has rather put me off that model.
So are my asseements of each model fair?
Purcase price aside, which would model would *you* choose, any why?
With the new XJ about to finally become available, I suspect we'll see used X350s become even more affordable. That's got me to thinking whether I should go on the lookout for a 2005 or 2006 car (I don't like the 2007 "facelift" very much) to replace my 1995 X300 Daimler Six. Not that there's anything wrong with my old Daim but other than it being LWB, it's not overly practical in terms of interior passenger and storage space and I'm concerned that some parts can now only be had second-hand or are ridiculously expensive. Also, as a 1995 model, I'm constantly looking at its wheelarches and sills for signs of corrosion (I've aready replaced the nearside rear outer and inner wings).
... Then again does the X308 represent a good compromise between the X300 and X350?
So I'm trying to weigh up the pros and cons of al three models and this is what I've come up with so far...
X300
Pros:
Classic, nostalgic Jaguar look'n'feel.
Very reliable.
Maintenance largely easy for competent DIY'er.
Cons:
Wheelarch, sill and A-pillar corrosion problems on early models.
LWB version is the only realistic option for carrying rear passengers long distances.
Headroom limited for tall occupants.
Storage space (glovebox, etc) very limited.
Switchgear scattered about.
Some parts getting scarce and/or expensive.
Prone to underside scrapes on speed-bumps when carrying passengers, as is LWB version on steep ramps.
X308
Pros:
Great combination of classic interior with just the right amount of modernisation (IMHO).
Much less prone to corrosion than early X300s.
Improved ride quality over X300.
Parts availability and prices often better than that for X300 (for the time being, anyway).
Slightly higher off the ground in comparison to the X300, therefore better able to cope with modern roads.
Cons:
Cam chain tensioners on pre-August 2001 cars need (very expensive) replacement
Water pump prone to failure on pre-2001 cars
Throttle body suspect on pre-2001 cars?
If car has done over 100,000 miles without a change of ATF, assume gearbox will be on its way out.
Not a very "DIY-able" engine
More expensive to service than X300(?)
2001 Daimler variants scarce... 2002 models almost non-existent!
LWB only realistic option for carrying rear passengers long distances.
Headroom limited for tall occupants.
Storage space (glovebox, etc) very limited.
X350
Pros:
Wider choice of engines, including diesel
Better all-round occupant accommodation than X300 and X308 (LWB version no longer a necessity?)
More power than X300 and X308
More (genuinely useful) equipment
Improved boot space
Overall very reliable(?)
Cons:
CORROSION - and Jaguar's/Tata's refusal to acknowledge it
"Middle-age spread" bodyshape!
Rather "Ford-like" in some respects - no longer "feels" like a classic Jaguar(?)
CATS Suspension prone to (expensive) failure
Diesel Particulate Filter prone to failure.
Super V8 variants (not XJR) very scarce.
Daimler variants almost non-existent!
Overall the X300 is still a wonderful car but has practicality limitations. The X308 carries a risk of repair work that could easily outweight the value of the car itself. On paper the X350 is the outright winner but I have to say the corrosion problem - and, more particularly, Jaguar's disgraceful attitude towards it - has rather put me off that model.
So are my asseements of each model fair?
Purcase price aside, which would model would *you* choose, any why?